.
Feedback

Will Budget Cuts Put Special-Needs Student at Risk?

One mother worries about what will happen to her son if the school district does not provide a specially trained aide for one-on-one support.

For 432 new kindergartners in the Lemon Grove School District this fall, a world of learning opens Sept. 6 with their unforgettable first day of school.

In one case, the excitement and emotions of that milestone could be overshadowed by unresolved issues stemming from a mother’s dedication to achieving the best for her special-needs son, and the harsh realities of public-school budgets at a time of painful cutbacks.

Robin Driver’s son, Josiah, has been diagnosed with autism and Neuro-Immune Dysfunction Syndrome, which affect his cognitive and bodily functions. Driver said Josiah, who turns 6 in September, can succeed at Lemon Grove’s San Altos Elementary with support from a specially trained aide providing him with one-on-one assistance.

Driver said state policy and law, which call for special-education students to be taught in the same classrooms as others wherever possible, affirm her right to the support. But after a half-dozen meetings on the matter since June, Driver said the district is planning to assign a generalized aide to her son’s classroom, someone who she believes may not be qualified to deal with his special needs.

“Without the support, he will not be able to succeed in general ed,” Driver said.

Gina Potter, district assistant superintendent for business services, said she can’t discuss the Driver case because of confidentiality issues.

Driver said district officials have told her there are budget considerations to her request for specialized support, and that it’s within their discretion to decide what kind of aide to assign to Josiah’s class.

The district is faced with drastic reductions this school year—its operating budget for 2011-12 is $3.9 million less than the previous year, requiring extensive cuts in its clerical staff.

At first, Driver said the district wanted to put Josiah in a special-education class, with other special-needs kids. She adamantly resisted that idea and just recently succeeded in having her son placed in a mainstream class.

In his final year of preschool with a general-population class of about 24, Driver said Josiah made huge strides—an outcome she attributes to the kind of specialized behavioral support, provided at the district’s expense, that she wants continued in kindergarten.

In Josiah’s case, that meant dealing with a child who sometimes hit or pinched himself and suffered severe gastrointestinal problems.

“They understand how to deal with the behaviors and how to modify things on the spot,” Driver said of the specialized behavioral support aides. Sometimes an aide might need to work right alongside Josiah; other times it would be more appropriate to pull back a bit so he could be a little more independent.

Driver has hired an attorney to help her press her case with the district; school administrators have proposed at least one more meeting to try to resolve their differences.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lemon Grove Patch? Find your Local Patch »

LymaBeane August 31, 2011 at 08:13 pm
Finding what works to educate a child with Autism is hard enough. Now that this child has found success against the odds, they want to take it away? The school should be fostering continued success, and set this little boy up for another successful year.
The law states schools are to provide a Free Appropriate Public Education to fit the childs individual and unique needs. For this child, it seems that his unique needs have been met through this specialized support. Shame on Lemon Grove School District for ignoring this childs individual needs.
LemonGroove August 31, 2011 at 08:44 pm
Another reason why Special Education Advocates are worth their money. They fight for your child even better than lawyers do, in my opinion. Lemon Grove School District tries very hard to not provide what is Federally mandated to provide for Special Ed students. I know. I've been there and that's why I choose to take my children to school out of District. LGSD is potentially setting themselves up for a whopper of a Federal lawsuit if it continues the ways of the past and present. Check out advocates. They will open a whole new world.
vanessa surprise August 31, 2011 at 09:17 pm
If a child is making significant forward progress with the proper aide support why take it away?!?!?! It is so sad when a school district puts money ahead of a quality education. Josiah deserves to be successful and learn just like any other child in his district. If that means giving him proper aide support then that is what he must get. As a mom of a son with the same two diagnosises, I am a firm believer in giving kids like ours the same opportunities as everyone else. Some kids need glasses to see and some need aides to learn. Keep fighting! Lusd needs to do right by all their students!
Marcia Hinds August 31, 2011 at 10:55 pm
It takes a tremendous amount of courage to go against a large school district to make sure your child gets what they need to be successful in school. That is one special mommy!!!
Liz P August 31, 2011 at 10:57 pm
INDIVIDUALIZED Education Plan (IEP) is supposed to be designed to ensure a child makes MEANINGFUL progress in all domains. It is against the law to deny services because there is no budget (there are mechanisms in place for the District to apply to the Federal Government, if needed). A child cannot be placed based upon their diagnosis nor can a District claim the offered classroom/supports are the only choice. Demand the services necessary to keep your child safe, engaged, and learning at his best level of capability IN WRITING - when the District refuses, demand a INFORMED NOTICE OF REFUSAL which should detail :
see next comment
Liz P August 31, 2011 at 10:58 pm
The form, Informed Notice of Refusal to take a Specific Action (ESE-062) includes the
following components required by IDEA regulations at 34 CFR § 300.503(b) Content of notice. The notice required under paragraph (a) of this section must include – (1) A description of the action proposed or refused by the agency; (2) An explanation of why the agency proposes or refuses to take the action; (3) A description of any other options that the agency considered and the reasons why those options were rejected; (4) A description of each evaluation procedure, test, record, or report the agency used as basis for the proposed or refused action; (5) A description of any other factors that are relevant to the agency’s proposal or refusal; (6) A statement that the parents of a child with a disability have protection under the procedural safeguards of this part and, if this notice in not an initial referral for evaluation, the means by which a copy of a description of the procedural safeguards can be obtained; and (7) Sources for parents to contact to obtain assistance in understanding the provisions of this part.
carol surprise August 31, 2011 at 11:02 pm
i absolutely agree that every child with a learning disability deserves the right to have a individual aid with experience to help those in need. i am a grandmother to my grandson who has autism and it breaks my heart to see the struggle each family goes through to receive the proper assistance needed. Please help those who truly need the support. It is most important that these issues get addressed.
Amy Mitten-Smith September 1, 2011 at 12:02 am
Special education programs and services are federally mandated and should not be altered. By federal law disabled children are entitled to an education that meets their INDIVIDUAL needs. So why is LGSD taking away a service that was working for this child to succeed? If the supports in place for this child helped him last year, LGSD shouldn't alter them and set him up for failure for the next year. Furthermore, “budget cuts” is not a valid excuse to deny FAPE (free appropriate public education) to our special needs children and violation of IDEA. As a mother with a child who has autism, I know that not every child with special needs is getting an appropriate education from public schools. Schools take advantage of the fact that most parents do not know what their special needs children are entitled to by law and the fact that very few parents can afford to fight them. I applaud Ms. Driver for educating herself and standing up to advocate for her son’s needs!!
Rebecca Estepp September 1, 2011 at 12:09 am
When will the school districts, state and federal governments realize that investment in children with needs is critical during the early years? The money put into them at that stage will most likely end up saving tax payers millions in the long run and give the child a fighting chance at the best life possible. Good for Mrs. Driver for fighting for her son, Josiah and learning her rights. I hope she paves the way for other children with special needs in the Lemon Grove District.
Marcus E. September 1, 2011 at 02:00 am
I applaud the parents of young Josiah for fighting to get the support he needs to move forward with as normal a childhood as possible. As difficult as it is for kids without autism to succeed in todays school system it must be incredibly disheartening for a sufferer to have to go through what this child has. When will people and government realize that education is the LAST thing that should be cut!
Rod C September 1, 2011 at 03:18 am
I am a father of a child who has Autism and once again we have a child who is on the right track only to have officials who don't know what they are doing throw up roads blocks!!!!!! I am so tired of hearing stories like this, when are these educators going to learn what helps these children? The budget cuts are only making these issues worse, however I want everyone to know that the real problem is that they just don't get it? What I mean is the Educators that we have today just don't believe that the kids with Autism can really get better by placing them in a typical learning environment. It is even more obvious now because the same problems Mrs Driver is having "they say its budget related" are the same problems we have all had even when the budgets were in good shape. This is Just an excuse from the district! This is nothing more than a school district writing off another child with special needs. Instead what they rather do is gather up all the kids into Special Ed classrooms and not teach them academic standards. This is why all parents have to fight with their School Districts because of this mentality. Its time that these educators include these kids with the best support system. They see it backwards and its very concerning as a parent to see this happen to your child. There is no reason that Josiah should not continue with this highly trained aide and money budget issues should have never come up. Robin keep up the good work and I am behind you all the way!!
Wendy Czech September 1, 2011 at 11:18 am
I am disgusted how politicians cater to illegals when legal and well deserved children suffer! How about some of that money soon to be promised to illegals go tirades special needs LEGAL children???
SHAME SHAME SHAME. We will remember how our children are treated next election!!!
Cindy Facteau September 1, 2011 at 12:00 pm
I am the mother of two boys on the Autism spectrum, and I know very well what lengths the districts will go to in order to cut corners and save a few dollars. Fortunately, parents like myself (and Ms. Driver) would like for our children to potentially be future taxpayers instead of future tax burdens, and so we strap on our boots and go into battle with these officials who seem to think themselves above the law, circumventing legislation enacted to protect the educational integrity of children affected by disabling conditions. It's shameful when an institution of learning becomes just as shady and underhanded as any other big corporation. Our children are not part of the profit margin by any sense of the definition...unless you count the INVESTMENT we make in helping them to achieve maximum success! I wonder where Temple Grandin would be right now had her mother not insisted she get a quality education? Food for thought.
Keep fighting the good fight, Robin. Maybe some of these school districts will do away with six figure salaries for their superintendents...and petition to repeal the monumental failure that is No Child Left Behind. I'm sure that would keep the coffers filled a little more. :)
LemonGroove September 1, 2011 at 12:45 pm
A child is a child no matter what his/her parents did in the past. Remember when children from unmarried parents were called Bastards? Come on! How can we teach our children to do the just thing when politicians, school administrators, and adults keep letting them down?
Richard J. September 1, 2011 at 03:53 pm
With a county that is already falling in ranks of worldwide education and failing to get those numbers back up to standard, it is very sad to hear that our school district would not give this child the chance to excel where results have already proven to be in the positive. How can we a good citizens continue to allow big government to handle our children's needs? Is our country destine to become politically incorrect?
Lissa September 1, 2011 at 04:21 pm
Is the school aware they are most likely committing a federal law violation under FAPE?
http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/edlite-FAPE504.html Within Section 504: “No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States . . . shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, BE DENIED BENEFITS OF, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance . . .” "An appropriate education will include...education services designed to meet the individual education needs of students with disabilities AS ADEQUATELY AS the needs of nondisabled students are met...The quality of education services provided to students with disabilities must equal the quality of services provided to nondisabled students.... Teachers of students with disabilities MUST BE TRAINED in the instruction of individuals with disabilities. Facilities must be comparable, and appropriate materials and equipment must be available...."
Yadira September 1, 2011 at 05:21 pm
It is not suppose to be about budget in regards to special education. The law mandates that their education be Free Appropriate Public Education and that they receive placement and services according to the individual child's needs. Not according to district convenience or willingness to provide.
I too am having difficulties with this same District. Lemon Grove School District does not support inclusion efforts, and does go out of the way to make things hard for parents seeking basic education rights to their children. A lot of tears, frustration, and money has been a result of their refusal to support our kids adequately. We need to get our stories out to expose how Lemon grove see's money first, and the child last. I would like to welcome all moms and/or dads that are having the same problem with the Lemon Grove School District to come together and raise our voices.
Yaneth Escobosa September 1, 2011 at 10:25 pm
Is sad to see how the budget cuts in our educational system has affected all of our kids. Where it seems that the law to provide the adequate education to all children is not prevailing and where parents like Robin have to find anyway possible to help her son. It is hard enough that us parents with children with special needs have to deal with adapting and learned how to help and better our childs life have to confront such careless and unethical behavior by those who are there to provide us with help. This is so wrong and is time to let them know that we the parents will do anything under the law to help our children to find success in life.
rose September 1, 2011 at 10:36 pm
Having read Ms. Driver's dilemma with regard to her son's education I understand she desires the best educational services to meet his needs. Having said that and having read all the above comments, I feel uncomfortable passing judgment before I hear/know all the facts. The school district cannot comment because of confidentiality... of course. Let cool heads prevail and I'm confident that LGSD and Ms. Driver will come up with an educational plan (I E P) that will be acceptable to her and meet her son's needs.
LemonGroove September 2, 2011 at 12:01 am
You sound like a school administrator. Always covering your behind before trying to do your best for the people you are supposed to be working for.
Tricia Roberts September 2, 2011 at 11:06 am
Why take something away from a child that is WORKING???....especially when it is working so WELL that he is able to be brought into a generalized setting...I applaud Josiah's parents for advocating for their child who has every right to have the same opportunities that he did last year...as a mother of a special needs child myself...you want to continue the things that are WORKING for your child.
LymaBeane September 2, 2011 at 09:11 pm
I think it's better to give a special needs child the tools necessary for adequate education. Josiah is young and this is the time his brain can absorb this, if he doesn't receive it, he will regress and it will be too late for him. We want him to grow up to be an independant "tax payer" and be able to give back and be part of society. Without this he will grow up and be a burden to the state and that comes out of our tax dollars. Spend it now or spend more later. These children with Autism are going to grow up and if you think they are hard to deal with now, wait until they become adults with little or no education! I read that it will be a "silent tsunami" and that will become all of our problem! Ms Driver is involved in her son's education and that is more than a lot of parents are with neurotypical children. If the school doesn't give him what he needs now, it will be a sorry situation for him as an adult. An adequate education is the best thing to give a child to make sure he/she grows up to be a independant working adult. That is what the school system should be doing. A special needs child needs an adequate education as well. But they need special tools to aide them and not providing it to them when they need it really makes the school system look greedy like they only care about the money and not educating children. That's a shame!
J.C. September 2, 2011 at 11:23 pm
If the prior support helped Josiah make improvements, then it was an appropriate education. Shame on Lemon Grove for trying to take this away from such a young child. Provide FAPE and give this child a chance!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Shull June 1, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Love Lido's!!! The whole Tarditi family has been eating there and holding family events there sinceRead More the day they opened. Five generations of our family have enjoyed their food and hospitality. When you go to Lido's, your treated as family. And their food is Delicious!!!
Carol Ybarrondo Rauscher June 1, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Been eating there consistently since 1960....best Italian anywhere!
Mary Anne June 16, 2013 at 09:35 pm
Best pizza!!
Jeannie Oliwa May 28, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Good job!
Christine Huard (Editor) May 28, 2013 at 04:49 pm
Great news! Thanks for posting on Lemon Grove Patch!